Verify it's really you

Please re-enter your password to continue with this action.

Published on Oct 22, 2026
The Hindu Summary- 22nd Oct 2026

India's Core Sector Growth Surges to Historic 7.9% in September Under Revised Index

 

 

A Historic Acceleration in Industrial Activity

India’s core industrial growth accelerated to a historic high of 7.9% in September, driven by a powerful turnaround in the coal sector alongside increased activity in refinery products and iron ore. The latest data released for the Index of Core Industries shows that last month’s expansion was the highest since at least April 2024, which marks the earliest month for which the government's newly introduced series has data. While a direct comparison with the older series is not strictly statistically sound due to structural updates, it provides vital context; the growth recorded in September 2026 represents the highest expansion rate seen in nearly three years when evaluated against the previous index series.

The Revised Index Structure and Base Year

The landmark numbers come alongside a major overhaul of India's macroeconomic tracking tools. The Office of Economic Adviser under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, operating under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, released this first provisional Index of Core Industries under a brand-new series utilizing 2022-23 as the base year.

Crucially, the revised ICI has expanded its scope from eight to nine core industries by officially including Iron Ore. This addition formally recognizes the material's extensive use in domestic steel manufacturing and its vital structural contribution to the country's overall industrial development.

Sector Weights and Component Breakdown

Following the structural revision, the combined index tracks nine key sectors with specific statistical weights distributed across a total baseline of 100%:

  • Electricity: Holds the highest individual weight in the index at 30.93%.
  • Refinery Products: Remains the second most influential component with a weight of 22.57%.
  • Steel: Follows closely as a major heavy-industry driver at 17.58%.
  • Crude Oil: Comprises 7.43% of the newly structured index.
  • Coal: Accounting for 5.59%, its sharp turnaround acted as a key driver for the September surge.
  • Iron Ore: The newly inducted sector debuts with a strategic weight of 4.90%.
  • Cement: Represents 4.41% of the core industrial tracking framework.
  • Natural Gas: Comprises 3.84% of the total collective allocation.
  • Fertilizers: Retains the smallest share of the framework at 2.73%.

This updated statistical foundation is designed to reflect modern production capacities more accurately, offering an upgraded lens on India's industrial health as infrastructure spending scales up.

 

INS Trishul Arrives in the U.K. for Bilateral Maritime Exercise KONKAN-26

Enhancing Tactical Synergy at Sea

The Indian Navy’s guided-missile stealth frigate INS Trishul has arrived at Plymouth, United Kingdom, to participate in the bilateral maritime exercise KONKAN-26 with the British Royal Navy. This annual flagship exercise, institutionalized in 2004, serves as a primary platform to build operational synergy and enhance tactical cooperation between both naval forces.

Exercise Scope and Strategic Objectives

Hosted by the United Kingdom off the coast of Plymouth, England, the drill brings together the frontline surface assets and personnel of the Indian Navy and the Royal Navy. The primary aim of the exercise is to consolidate tactical interoperability and facilitate the exchange of best operational practices across multi-threat warfare scenarios. By conducting these high-intensity simulations, both nations reaffirm their shared commitment toward maintaining open, secure, and free seas in full accordance with the international rules-based maritime order.

 

FSSAI Proposes Ban on Added Sugars for Infants to Align with WHO Guidelines

Eliminating the Sugar Allowance for Newborns

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued a draft proposal aiming to eliminate the allowance of added sucrose and fructose in products intended for infants aged 0-6 months. Currently, the Food Safety and Standards Regulations 2020 permit manufacturers to add these sugars, provided their combined total does not exceed 20% of the carbohydrates in the product. This proposed shift directly aligns with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommendation for exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months, followed by nutritionally adequate complementary foods that completely avoid added sugars until the child reaches 24 months.

The Health Risks of Early Sugar Exposure

The tightening of regulations comes amid growing global concern over early childhood nutrition. The WHO’s 2022 nutrient and promotion profile model for baby foods specifically flagged sweet purées and products where processing releases natural fruit sugars as major areas of concern.

Medical research indicates that dietary habits formed during infancy have long-lasting effects. Children who regularly consume sweetened water during their first months develop a strong preference for sweeter liquids later in life. Conversely, exposure to a wider variety of formula flavours influences dietary preferences years later, helping children accept neutral- or bitter-tasting healthy foods. Public and personal health experts emphasize that infants need to encounter diverse flavours to prevent future dependencies on ultra-processed options.

Closing Regulatory Loopholes

While the FSSAI's draft proposal is a necessary step, public health advocates warn that stopping here is insufficient. Without a more comprehensive framework, manufacturers could easily substitute banned sucrose with other alternative sweetening ingredients. To prevent this, regulators must assess both individual additive ingredients and the complete nutritional profile of finished food products.

Furthermore, some health experts argue that limiting the new restriction to infants under six months does not go far enough. Given that the 2024 dietary guidelines from the ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition explicitly state that children under two should avoid added sugars entirely, a six-month threshold is viewed by critics as an unnecessary concession to food corporations.

Strengthening the Legal Shield

India's regulatory response to ultra-processed foods is finally expanding after years of slow progress. The country already possesses a strong legal mechanism via the Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods Act 1992, which aggressively restricts the commercial marketing of infant foods for children up to two years old. Health advocates assert that the FSSAI must now mirror this strict timeline in its ingredient regulations to fully shield young children from the growing epidemic of metabolic health issues.

 

Navi Pillay Awarded 2026 Nobel Peace Prize Amid Global Fight for International Law

A Timely Recognition for Global Justice

The news that South African jurist Navi Pillay is the recipient of the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize could not have come at a better time for those agonisingly disconcerted by global apathy towards international law. At a time when international legal frameworks are being severely battered by powerful, authoritarian leaders pursuing imperialistic designs, the Nobel Committee has unequivocally signalled that international law still matters. However, her recognition raises a critical question regarding what kind of international law matters in a highly fractured global landscape.

The Retooling of the Legal Order

Multiple complex narratives currently shape international law. One prominent narrative highlights that vital tenets—such as the prohibition of the use of force in international relations—have been completely shredded as multiple wars rage across the globe. Similarly, rising authoritarianism has caused a precipitous waning in compliance with international human rights law, leading to an increase in war crimes and crimes against humanity.

While authoritarian leaders attacking these fundamental tenets might give the impression that they are entirely hollowing out international law, a more nuanced reality is emerging: authoritarians are actively retooling international law to justify and pursue their own strategic objectives.

Defending the Foundations of Justice

Although the liberal international law order’s democratic credentials can always be questioned, it successfully institutionalised civil, political, and human rights as part of its core operating system. Under this traditional framework, countries created international organisations and delegated significant powers to them, accompanied by high judicialisation through the creation of international courts and tribunals to settle disputes.

Because authoritarian regimes cannot be expected to develop a fair international legal order premised on justice, the responsibility to protect these systems falls to others. Independent international courts, robust civil society groups, and academia must mount continuous international resistance against authoritarian overreach to pave the way for a liberal, resilient, and fair international legal future.

 

Saudi Arabia Faces Strategic Dilemma Amid Iran-Houthi Pincer and Maritime Chokepoint Pressures

An Unprecedented Challenge for West Asia's Giant

West Asia’s largest economy and the world’s eighth-largest defence spender is no pushover, yet simultaneous constrictions at its two vital maritime chokepoints pose an unprecedented challenge to the Kingdom. Saudi Arabia is forced to navigate these severe geopolitical vulnerabilities while simultaneously grappling with a domestic economic downturn and rapidly shifting diplomatic alliances abroad.

The Century-Old Conflict

Historically, the friction between Saudi Arabia and the al-Houthi forces is rooted in a conflict that is nearly a century old. In 1934, Saudi King Ibn Saud’s forces defeated Yemeni Imam Yahya’s tribal fighters, compelling the latter to cede three provinces in the Asir region under the Treaty of Taif. Although a definitive bilateral border was eventually demarcated in 2000, many Yemeni nationalists continue to question its finality, keeping historical grievances alive.

The Military Stalemate and Institutional Apathy

Riyadh currently possesses no optimal options for untangling the unprecedented strategic pincer formed by Iran and the al-Houthis. Despite commanding a massive $83 billion defence budget, Saudi Arabia lacks the conventional military heft required to dislodge al-Houthi fighters from their highly fortified mountainous perches through a ground offensive.

Meanwhile, military operations led by its local Yemeni allies have bogged down into a grueling war of attrition. Key pro-Saudi international stakeholders, including the White House and partners to the Makkah Agreement, have responded with little more than tokenism. These external allies appear daunted by Yemen’s historical reputation as a graveyard of foreign interventions, as well as the catastrophic economic prospects of the Bab al-Mandeb Strait being blocked once again.

The Risky Path toward De-escalation

With direct military victory out of reach, the only remaining viable strategy for the Kingdom is to negotiate a comprehensive package of measures. This approach would require:

  • De-escalating active frontline tensions.
  • Lifting mutual air and maritime blockades.
  • Structuring a formal truce based on the framework of the 2022 ceasefire.

However, from Riyadh’s perspective, pursuing this diplomatic exit route carries profound strategic risks. A negotiated settlement could result in a severe loss of domestic and regional prestige for the Saudi leadership. Furthermore, it risks triggering the total collapse of Yemen’s highly fractious, internationally recognized government, ultimately leading to the permanent consolidation of the hostile Tehran-Sana’a axis on the Kingdom's southern border.

 

Unlocking the Economic and Ecological Potential of Forest Rights Act Lands Through Sustainable Agriculture

From Legal Rights to Livelihood Security

While the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, also known as the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, has strengthened the livelihood rights of millions of tribals and forest-dwelling communities, the next step is to complement these rights with sustainable agriculture practices. For a tribal household, a legally recognized parcel of land means much more than just ownership; it represents the foundation of long-term livelihood security. However, this security can only be realized if conducive conditions exist to make the high-altitude and marginal land genuinely productive and sustainable.

The Strategic Role of Oilseeds and Pulses

Oilseeds and pulses can play a vital role in unlocking the latent productive potential of FRA-recognised lands. Promoting the targeted cultivation of these specific crops can transform these plots into highly productive and remunerative assets for tribal communities. Beyond enhancing local economies, scaling up production inside these areas will simultaneously strengthen India's domestic food supplies and reduce the nation's heavy economic dependence on agricultural imports.

Furthermore, the natural adaptability of pulses and oilseeds to rain-fed environments and marginal soil types makes them an ideal choice for climate-resilient agriculture. They help improve soil health while maximizing agricultural productivity under challenging climatic conditions.

Mapping Agro-Ecological Diversity

The geographical spread of tribal districts across 33 States and Union Territories reflects immense ecological and socio-economic diversity. These regions vary widely in settlement patterns, natural resource availability, and localized agricultural potential. Consequently, policymakers must utilize development models that are highly responsive to local conditions and native priorities.

An extensive analysis based on the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) soil map suggests that several tribal pockets are naturally well-suited to support critical crops such as soybean, groundnut, sunflower, mustard, chickpea, and various other pulses. A closer look at state-wise cropping patterns reveals deep structural diversity:

  • Kharif Season: Dominated heavily by traditional paddy and maize cultivation.
  • Rabi Crops: Primarily supported by wheat, gram, mustard, lentil, and pulses.
  • Regional Diversification: Crops like millets, cotton, sesame, spices, and horticulture further reflect local agro-ecological conditions, offering a perfect baseline for sustainable diversification on FRA lands.

Targeted Cluster Interventions

A spatial analysis of India's 244 tribal districts reveals significant agricultural overlap: 60 districts hold major oilseed production potential, 31 districts possess strong pulse production capabilities, and 23 districts feature highly favourable conditions for cultivating both pulses and oilseeds simultaneously.

This clear alignment between FRA lands and agricultural potential indicates an urgent need for targeted, region-specific interventions. By adopting a cluster-development strategy, the government can systematically develop dedicated oilseed and pulse production hubs in these high-potential zones. To ensure the success of these clusters, interventions must focus on expanding access to high-quality seeds, improving soil moisture retention regimes, and training farmers in scientific crop management.

Integrating these modern agricultural measures with baseline FRA land development will make tribal communities more economically resilient. Because many of these high-potential tribal districts directly overlap with designated Aspirational Districts, these targeted agricultural reforms will simultaneously boost national food security, enhance farm incomes, and drastically improve nutritional security where it is needed most.